Khaled
Hafez |
|||
Interviews |
|||
Unearthing the Past You can tell that Khaled Hafez began his career as an artist after studying medicine: Much of his work examines the human condition, man’s place in the world and his journey through life. Through Hafez’s work, we witness his, or our own, creative conscience where ideas are juxtaposed, images from the past are unearthed and brought into a modern context, childhood memories are prized above all else and cast (literally) in bronze. Hafez is Egyptian and so the iconic Egyptian deities and figures from the Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead and hieroglyphics form recurring themes in his work, where they are actualized and brought into contemporary life; Anubis, the jackal-headed guide of the dead is likened to Batman, the comic book hero, 1950s American Cars, Coca-Cola cans and other recognizable consumer icons, common ideals or measures of success, are painted or stuck in. Hafez’s work seems to delve into our daily lives, using Ancient Egyptian and consumer-conscious 1950s America imagery to make connections, explore real abstract thoughts linked to violence, death, life and popular culture - the results are both startling and inspiring. SK: Khaled Hafez, in your works for the exhibition, Moving Forward by the Day at the Meem Gallery in Dubai, you seemed to focus on layering the Ancient Egyptian gods and the iconography of the Book of the Dead with modern images. Juxtaposing different ideas and images has been a theme of your work for several years - Is this a process or a result? SK: You explored this layering of images, with paintings and installation in your Tomb Sonata in Three Movements which was exhibited first as Tomb Sonata in three Military Movements as part of the 12th Cairo Biennale in 2010 and then as Second Sonata in three Archaeological Movements in 2012 in Paris at the Institut du Monde Arabe, and finally as Tomb Sonata in Two Military Movements: the sequel, at the Havremagasinet Museum in Boden, Switzerland, that same year. The Military Sonatas are three-part installation spaces that resemble an ancient Egyptian tomb plan. It isolates the viewer and the images of gods and machines of war and violence, and the silhouettes of soldiers in combat positions suspended in the dark are dimly lit and have intrusive ultraviolet lights showing that the patterns that emerge, which are reminiscent of hieroglyphs. The viewer is reminded of the inevitability of death – a modern Momento Mori. SK: You have mentioned ‘Egyptian identity’ in a historical context, relating to the ancient tombs and to the ancient gods, but what about the modern Egyptian identity? You show guns and tanks – what about the events that have taken place in the last few years? KH: I believe that Egypt is ancient Egyptian, Judeo-Christian, Islamic, Arab and much before all that, African, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern. . All this is what I call the Big Mac Theory of Egyptian Identity. Egypt is all those layers, cumulative and combined. [As an Egyptian] … I host them in me. The problems in public discourse happen when a group with thought myopia belonging to a certain strata or stream of thought decide that Egypt belongs only to one layer of this cumulative cultural sandwich. Though reluctant to take a political stance, this inclusive view emphasizes the richness and diversity of Egyptian culture and indeed that of human existence. Hafez goes beyond social classes and political ideas and though he mixes different ideas and shapes regardless of time and context, Hafez could be described as a pragmatist and a realist; He observes the evolution of shapes over time and notes which picks up on the enduring images, collecting and recasting them in his own gallery of thoughts and ideas. Is this what we all unconsciously do? Pile up ideas, things that we have seen, memories and ideas piled up haphazardly in our minds, without much thought for proportions or perspective? In Hafez’s art, often these are the popular and easily recognizable shapes such as a coke bottle or a car, because of mass-production these familiar images can also be the ancient Egyptian deities such as Anubis and Hathor so often seen on documentaries, in Egyptology books, or reproduced on trays and tea-towels, calendars and mugs. “I am inspired and draw from contemporary advertising and consumer goods, visual idioms and designs. I incline to this process because I want the entire element that I use to have been a déjà vu for all audiences; this is part of globalization and international popular culture. The final art production - and I care a lot about that too, not just the process – thus becomes more accessible to audiences from East and West, and across all age groups. Or at least I attempt to achieve that! SK: Your graphic style and recourse to so many elements of popular culture have meant that you are often compared to Andy Warhol and your work has been likened to that produced during the Pop Art movement. SK: Mixing ancient deities with commercial goods must have repercussions – has there been any resistance to your juxtaposing sacred and commercial images in Egypt or abroad? SK: Can our readers have a sneak preview of the work that you are showing in the Maldives Pavilion in Venice this year? One of the consequences of Hafez’s mixing – almost like a modern music DJ – of old, sacred and modern new images is that it can be interpreted as sarcastic and disrespectful. In her book, Modern Egyptian Art, Liliane Karnouk suggests that Hafez’s art reflects a ‘post millennial mood’. Perhaps it could also be seen as an important act of ‘post millennial’ demystification. As we are often reminded in the media through disagreements over ancient tribal objects or the activities of sensationalist media icons looking to emulate powerful religious or historical icons, the questioning of past symbols and their demystification is a process that mankind invariably undertakes over time... While Hafez may not give images the same recognition that they held in their original context, he looks at their graphic shape and iconic power. He ‘plays’ not so much with their image, but with their context, taking the menace and fear from a threatening image of a sniper or an armoured tank and the respectful idolatry from an Ancient Egyptian deity, making them as familiar as any day-to-day household object and encouraging us to look upon them with a comfortable familiarity. Is this a bad thing? While Hafez’s art is made up of juxtaposed and layered images, it is important to note that he also works hard to strip away the meanings and associations behind each individual image – reducing them to their original, graphic shape and reversing the automatic associations we have through the media and social consciousness, unquestioningly and habitually come to give them. This is not a simple task but one that we must not be afraid of exploring if we are to set about building new ideas about art appreciation and aesthetic theory.
|
|||